pesco eu constitutional people before profit td richard boyd barrett government government’s
Stream Keywords: ,before td,eu ireland,eu pesco,eu government,eu government’s,people profit,barrett before,richard td,constitutional eu,barrett profit,government ireland,people td, td,boyd people,profit td, barrett,constitutional government, before,profit richard,barrett boyd,barrett people,constitutional ireland, profit, richard, boyd,boyd richard,boyd profit,government government’s,boyd td,barrett richard,before boyd, people,barrett td,people richard,government’s ireland,constitutional government’s,before richard,before people,before profit
People Before Profit TD Richard Boyd Barrett has said his party is considering a constitutional challenge to the Government’s proposal to join a new EU military structure.
On Thursday, the Dáil voted by 75 to 42 for Ireland to join the Pesco (Permanent Structure Co-operation) agreement on greater co-operation with other countries on military missions around the world.
The Government and Fianna Fáil supported the proposal while Sinn Féin, Labour, Solidarity People Before Profit, Independents4Change, the Green Party and a number of Independents oppose the proposal and claimed the Government tried to “ram it through” without proper debate.
Mr Boyd Barrett made his comments during a heated four hour Dáil debate on the plan to join the Pesco. The Opposition said there was no rush and there should be a full debate with Army and other experts being called in to give a detailed analysis.
Opposition TDs called on the Independent Alliance to make their positions clear before the Government voted on the move. Independents4Change TD Clare Daly said Ministers of State Finian McGrath and John Halligan in particular, should do so when they had in opposition been vehemently opposed to the militarisation of Europe and an EU army.
But Tánaiste Simon Coveney who opened the debate rejected the claims that Ireland would be joining an EU army by supporting a new European military structure or that the proposal will breach Ireland’s neutrality.
Mr Coveney insisted that the State’s “traditional policy of military neutrality is not going to change”.
The Tánaiste claimed some TDs were trying to turn Pesco into something more than it was. Ireland would opt in or opt out on a voluntary basis to missions, he said.
These would be in the areas peacekeeping, counter-terrorism, training and marine surveillance.
But Mr Boyd Barrett described this as “cynical rubbish” and said the move is an “abandonment of our neutrality and is unconstitutional and should be challenged”.
He said “we will have to seriously consider a constitutional challenge”.
He said the process was very cynical he said the Government knew and had decided on Pesco but did not tell the business committee, a majority of which opposed the issue being voted on on Thursday.
Fianna Fáil defence spokeswoman Lisa Chambers said that in a post-Brexit scenario “it is extremely important that we as a member state show our support for the EU and its values”.
She could not understand “how anybody could suggest that this is somehow joining a European army”. But she said there should be ongoing debate on the role of the Defence Forces and the Department of Defence should update the Oireachtas on a quarterly basis about the engagements the State was involved in and the costs.
The Mayo TD believed increased spending on defence would force the department to fund and resource the Defence Forces and that the spending was on research for areas such as surveillance and not about making weapons.
The Tánaiste had earlier said there was “some misunderstanding” over funding. “There is absolutely no commitment to increase defence spending to 2 per cent of GDP.”
He said the 2 per cent solely reflected a collective commitment of 2 per cent of defence spending to be used for research.
But Ms Daly said estimates suggested the Government would be paying €1.3 billion by 2021 and that was “galling” at a time when Defence Force personnel were dependant on social welfare to make ends meet.
Sinn Féin defence spokesman Aengus O Snodaigh said somebody else would be “setting the agenda for us and our military spending in the future” and the State would have no control.
He said the proposal was in “direct violation of Article 29.4.9 of the Constitution. The provision holds that a Government cannot adopt any EU decision that would create a European common defence.”
Labour TD Brendan Ryan said his party leader Brendan Howlin had asked for a debate on the issue in June. He said the EU video on Pesco was like a movie trailer “glorifying military expenditure on weapons”.
Mr Ryan said “we don’t want Ireland clipped onto the tail of this wagon” and dragged irreversibly into a modernised European army.
Green party leader Eamon Ryan said the proposal went far beyond increasing cooperation. “This is about building a military and industrial armaments capability that will not provide security in the long run.”